The Malian transitional government has taken a decisive step in its firm stance, as revealed by a high-level executive meeting. The Council of Ministers has greenlit a draft ordinance that rewrites the nation’s nationality code, introducing a significant shift in policy. Moving forward, individuals born Malians who also hold another citizenship could face the revocation of their Malian nationality if found guilty of undermining the country’s vital interests.
Previously, Mali’s legal framework allowed for the withdrawal of nationality only from naturalized citizens. This new legislation marks a stark departure by directly targeting dual nationals who were born Malian, broadening the scope of state authority in matters of citizenship.
Terrorism, separatism and incitement under scrutiny
The newly adopted provisions outline stringent criteria for the revocation process. Authorities now reserve the right to initiate proceedings against individuals linked to foreign hostile entities, whether through collaboration or allegiance. Additionally, the law extends its reach to those involved in separatist movements, as well as those financing, supporting, or glorifying armed terrorist groups.
To ensure compliance with international conventions, the ordinance includes a safeguard: the revocation will only apply to individuals holding another nationality, preventing the creation of stateless persons and adhering to global legal standards.
Political opponents in the crosshairs
On the political front, this legislation is widely interpreted as a direct response to opposition figures—both within and beyond Mali’s borders. Several suspended political party leaders, suppressed press figures, and activists from the Permanent Strategic Framework (CSP) or other critical voices of the transition currently reside abroad, primarily in Europe or neighboring countries. Despite their physical distance, these individuals maintain substantial influence through media and operational networks back home.
By wielding this legal tool, Bamako aims to sever administrative and legal ties with those it perceives as obstacles to national rebuilding, effectively cutting off avenues for dissent both domestically and internationally.
