Their alliance was forged to keep the President within the Higher Council of the Judiciary, despite promises to the contrary.
Together, they chose to overlook the clear provisions for leadership appointments outlined in their own manifesto.
They vowed to repeal the amnesty law yet left it unchanged once in power.
Political funds were distributed without scrutiny, even as a reform to regulate them required only a parliamentary majority—which they secured months after taking office.
From shared silence to sudden reform zeal
Those who resisted change while Sonko stood with Diomaye now champion reforms they had ample time to implement. The National Assembly, a pillar of the Republic, deserves better than political score-settling, theatrics, and the exploitation of a rift that cannot erase shared accountability.
Breaking down the broken promises
Reform delays and unfulfilled commitments reveal a pattern of inconsistency. The Higher Council of the Judiciary, leadership appointments, and the amnesty law—all were subjects of empty pledges. When political survival took precedence, these promises were shelved without explanation.
Accountability in the shadow of political convenience
The distribution of political funds without oversight raises serious questions. A reform requiring minimal legislative support was ignored for months, only to be advanced once political winds shifted. This selective urgency undermines public trust and highlights the fragility of institutional commitments.
Institutions demand more than political theater
The National Assembly must rise above partisan divisions. Its role extends beyond symbolism; it is a cornerstone of democratic governance. The current spectacle of a fabricated rift should not distract from the core issue: restoring integrity to governance and ensuring leaders answer for their actions.
Thierno Bocoum
President, AGIR-LES LEADERS
