Politique

Senegal political crisis: opposition coalition demands Ousmane Sonko’s removal from parliament

Senegal’s FDR coalition pushes for Ousmane Sonko’s parliamentary expulsion

Senegal political leader Ousmane Sonko

The Front for the Defense of Democracy and the Republic (FDR) has formally requested the removal of Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko from Senegal’s National Assembly, citing what it describes as a violation of legal and constitutional norms.

A coalition of opposition parties has intensified pressure on the government by demanding the immediate exclusion of Ousmane Sonko from the National Assembly. In a strongly worded statement released on June 3, 2026, the FDR declared that Sonko’s continued presence in parliament while serving as Prime Minister constitutes an illegitimate and unlawful situation that undermines democratic principles.

The coalition argues that current electoral laws clearly prohibit ministers from retaining their parliamentary seats without resigning from government within eight days of their appointment. It further maintains that recent amendments to the Assembly’s internal regulations cannot override constitutional and statutory provisions.

Legal challenges mount against Sonko’s parliamentary status

The FDR has not only called for Sonko’s removal but has also urged opposition lawmakers to escalate the matter by referring it to the Constitutional Council. The coalition characterizes the process that allowed Sonko’s return to parliament as a violation of constitutional integrity, asserting that it represents a parliamentary coup aimed at subverting legal norms.

In their official communiqué, FDR leaders emphasized that they are prepared to mobilize civil society and political allies to defend what they describe as the fundamental pillars of the Republic. They insist that all institutions must operate strictly within the framework of the Constitution and existing laws.

The escalating dispute over Sonko’s parliamentary eligibility has dominated political discourse in Dakar, with legal experts and opposition figures weighing in on the constitutional validity of his dual role. The situation remains fluid as both sides prepare for potential court battles and further parliamentary maneuvers.