Skip to content

Ouaga Info

Your go-to English source for news from Ouagadougou and Burkina Faso, updated daily.

Menu
  • Home
  • Guides
  • Case Studies
  • Tutorials
  • Analysis
  • Resources
  • Opinions
  • Chronicle
Menu

Chad-Cameroon pipeline boosts Yaoundé’s income with FCFA 222 billion in transit fees

Posted on July 31, 2026September 25, 2026 by Martin Ngu
Listen to the article≈ 4 min

The Chad-Cameroon pipeline has become a steady revenue stream for Cameroon’s public treasury. Between 2020 and 2025, the Ministry of Finance recorded FCFA 222.2 billion in transit fees collected from Chadian crude oil transported to the Kribi maritime terminal. This figure, from the Medium-Term Economic and Budgetary Programming Document (2027-2029), translates to an annual average of FCFA 37 billion—a fee charged for every barrel crossing Cameroonian soil.

Chad, a landlocked nation without coastal access, relies entirely on this pipeline to export its oil. The transit fee is calculated per barrel transported, with rates adjusted periodically under agreements between the two countries. The actual revenue for Cameroon depends on three key factors: the per-barrel tariff, the volume of oil shipped, and the dollar-FCFA exchange rate.

Transit income triples over a decade

Comparing the first decade of operations with recent years highlights the dramatic increase in revenue. According to the Pipeline Steering and Monitoring Committee (PSMC), Cameroon earned FCFA 85.5 billion in transit fees during the first eight years of operations, which began on October 3, 2003. That averaged FCFA 10.7 billion per year—less than a third of today’s FCFA 37 billion annual take. Even over a shorter two-year span, recent collections exceed the full first eight years by FCFA 136.7 billion.

While the surge is clear, breaking down its exact causes remains challenging. The transit fee revenue depends on multiple variables: the per-barrel rate, the physical volume of oil transported, and the dollar-FCFA exchange rate. Without a detailed annual breakdown of the FCFA 222.2 billion, isolating the contribution of each factor is impossible.

Tariff hikes drive revenue growth

One major driver of the increase is the successive tariff adjustments. When the pipeline launched in 2003, the transit fee stood at $0.41 per barrel. It was raised in 2013, then again in 2018, reaching $1.321 per barrel—more than tripling in fifteen years. This alone has mechanically increased Cameroon’s revenue, regardless of oil volumes shipped.

A new rate was scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2023, as per the existing agreement. However, no updated tariff has been announced to date, leaving future transit fee projections uncertain. Tariff negotiations remain a persistent diplomatic topic between Cameroon and Chad.

Comparing past and present revenue requires caution

When reviewing historical data, it’s essential to clarify accounting differences. COTCO, the operator of Cameroon’s pipeline segment, reported roughly FCFA 200 billion in payments to the treasury between 2004 and 2013. However, this total included income tax and other levies paid by the company—not just transit fees. As such, it cannot be directly compared to the FCFA 222.2 billion collected between 2020 and 2025, which covers only transit fees. The exact share of transit fees within COTCO’s FCFA 200 billion remains undisclosed, making the FCFA 85.5 billion from the first eight years the most reliable benchmark for comparison.

The pipeline’s financial importance to Cameroon remains evident. By May 2026, transit fees had already reached FCFA 15.1 billion for the year, according to PSMC data. While this doesn’t predict the full-year total, it underscores the pipeline’s role in Yaoundé’s oil-export revenue. Industry analysts highlight that the pending tariff update—expected since October 2023—will be a key factor in shaping future revenue trends.

By Martin Ngu — Politics and National Security

News feeds (RSS)Get new articles in your favourite feed reader
Top StoriesAll stories

Recent Posts

  • Burkina Faso’s terrorism trial of Damiba risks breaking extradition pacts amid death penalty debate
  • International warrant for Ivorian pastor over terror claims shakes West Africa
  • Tillabéri tragedy: how ISIS-linked assault on civilian convoy exposes Niger’s rural security crisis
  • How Benin’s AI pilot status could reshape its economy and youth employment crisis
  • Niger’s court in turmoil: delayed retirements of top judges spark trust crisis

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • November 2026
  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • November 2019
  • July 2018
  • December 2014

Categories

  • A la Une
  • Actualités
  • AES
  • Analyses
  • Analysis
  • Authoritarian Regimes & Africa
  • Chronicle
  • Culture
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • Guides
  • International
  • Le Monde Afrique
  • Lifestyle
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Politics
  • Security & Defence
  • Société
  • Society
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Top Stories
©2026 Ouaga Info | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme
Ouaga Info

Your go-to English source for news from Ouagadougou and Burkina Faso, updated daily.

About Us Contact Privacy Policy Legal Notice

© 2026 Ouaga Info — All rights reserved.

https://ouagainfo.com